Skip to main content

The Power of the Dog is Awful

I'm trying to post more personal things to this blog and I thought after what I finished watching last night - this was a good post to start. I often think that there is something wrong with me; like a horrible cynic. I like to watch entertaining movies and television, but everything I find lately is just awful. And it's almost like this never-ending cycle of bad to worse. It's not like I'm just watching straight to video movies or anything, I'm watching highly awarded and often praised as the hot thing on Netflix.

Last night I watched The Power of the Dog (2021). A highly regarded movie with a lot of nominations for various awards and I've heard a lot of talk about it - so I watch it. I don't want to spoil the movie for you, but absolutely nothing happens in this movie. There is a point in a movie where you just keep watching to see if anything happens and determine what exactly your time accomplished.

Well, I can let you know that watching to the end will illustrate just how little value there is finishing off the movie. In fact, if you started the movie half way through, you'd be at the same place as someone watching from the start.

I've noticed this trend with movies. The production value is excellent. The cinematography is great. The acting is great. The location, makeup, etc is all great. 

The actual story, dialog and events are cancer on a stick.

In The Power of the Dog nothing happens. Most of the movie has absolutely nothing of value for the plot. When I say you can start watching from the halfway point, you really don't need to know anything in the first half of the movie. Kristen Dunst's character has no purpose in the movie, other than her existence allowing two characters to meet. Does her drama with playing the piano or her alcoholism matter? No. Jesse Plemons' character, again, what was he there for? He was so unneeded that his character just disappeared for periods of time from the movie.

You start to realize after a while that these characters and their stories were introduced merely as filler. Once finishing the movie, you discover that Kristen Dunst's character has all this time and focus - yet the character is merely a weak supporting character in the grand scheme of things. Her drama didn't matter in any way. In fact, most of the drama didn't matter. The movie was just one long filler for a poorly written short story.

Another thing I noticed about this movie (that I found The Leftovers (2014) did) is this drama build to a climax that never happens. When you create a plot, there is a basic structure to it. Basically you have the introduction, the rising action, a climax, falling action and conclusion. What happens is that there is this continuous building and focus on the rising action. It builds and builds, but it never reaches the climax - and as a viewer this is just an annoyance. I remember commenting during a point in the movie 'I don't know if he's going to kill this guy or Brokeback Mountain him.' 

And after the rising action builds to a high, oh you're not feeling good - let's go see the doctor. Next scene, that looks like a good coffin.

At the very end you find out he was murdered. Was it an elaborate plot or some revealing truth? Nah, it was - at the most sinister level - a moment of opportunity. It could have been merely neglegence. Does it matter? No.

A very bad movie. I suppose I could have caught onto the IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes rating split, but even IMDB is rated too high. 








Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Energy Market with Unreliables

 The energy market is going to be something that will be on people's minds for a long time because right now there is very poor policy and ideological views driving us to a crisis. There has been a nice little bull run going on over the last few months, and this may not be the crisis. It's something that may immerge here, but it might be 5-10 years from now. For the longest time I've been a passive index investor , and I still am for a nice chunk of my portfolio, but over the last 18 months I've decided that I'm going to apply my own judgment to the market place and invest accordingly. Over this time I've accumulated a pretty sizeable portfolio of LNG (Liquified Natural Gas) companies, in particular upstream and midstream companies. Renewable Energy or Green Energy are Unreliables There is a political push for green energy. It's driven by the moral ideas that green energy is this universally good  energy and all the other reliable energies we use like fossil

Answering COVID19 Conspiratards

  There's a lot to unpack here. "My doctor... vaccinated creates more ammo for the virus to grow stronger and more resistant..." I do admire that his doctor sounds a lot like the anti-vaxx doctors on the internet, but there is much to unpack. Sometimes I don't grasp the past that well, but I'm pretty sure before COVID19 we had vaccines. I think we had a lot of them. Small pox, measles, yearly influenza, etc. The data shows that we aren't being overwhelmed with super measles or seasonal super influenza that is worse and worse each year. It's not to say that it couldn't happen, but with the data we currently possess on vaccines - it isn't happening. Plus, if this were a problem - it isn't a vaccine problem. It would be an immunity problem. Let's just assume we went "all natural" and much of the world was infected with COVID19. Well, most of the world would gain the immune response t-cells and antibodies to fight future infections. A

Efficient Market Hypothesis and Passive Investing

 When it comes to investing in the market, there is a lot of contentious debate about what is best. I have found that people get so wrapped up in defending their strategy that they either overplay the ideas behind the strategy or just outright misrepresent them. I understand wanting one's investment strategy to work best but let us not delude ourselves. "Best" is not something that is easy qualitatively to measure when various investors have different risk tolerances, timelines and goals. The above is no less true when it comes to the Efficient Market Hypothesis (from now on as EMH); both from those for and against the idea of it. I think both (for and against) conceptualize EMH improperly and it takes away from the value it has as an investing strategy. I will add that I have 90% of my investment portfolio invested in passive index funds, which are the products utilized by those that follow EMH and the studies following from it. That's not to say I'm biased towar