Skip to main content

Alberta Government and Doctor Pay

 There has been a nice little debate in Alberta regarding the pay of doctors, in particular between the left NDP and the UCP conservatives. For the non-Canadians out there, Canada has single payer healthcare, which means there is a single payer of healthcare - the government. Of all the schemes out there, single payer is the most immoral universal health care, but that is a topic for another day.

The conservatives are contending that doctors are way overpaid and must take a pay cut for the sake of helping with the massive budget deficit that Alberta is suffering from. They do have a point. Alberta pays much more than comparable provinces. Alberta also has much lower taxes and much lower real estate costs, so I've seen it argued by the partisans that they're not going to leave because they simply won't be better off.

The NDP contend, when it comes to any government cut, that it is necessary to pay these prices to have the highest quality doctors. Wow, a far left party that actually understands a basic economic principle - that to get the best you have to pay a higher price. If only they conceded this when it comes to the income taxes they'd like to impose on doctors.

The Mixed Economy Effect

This discussion, as a capitalist on the sidelines, is interesting to watch. In Nova Scotia, as an example, this discussion has come up too. Ironically the conservatives and left are on the opposite side. Leftist proport that doctors should want to work for lower pay. That living in Nova Scotia, and doing their duty is more than enough reason to work there - Nova Scotia being an amazing place is pay enough - ignoring the fact that pay is bad, hours are bad, you're taxed to death and you live in a mainly rural province with no real city life.

How much should doctors be paid? Should they be paid at comparable wages to other provinces? Should they be paid comparable to the US, where they make much more?

The reason we can't come up with a number is that the market place for doctors has been prohibited in Canada. Prices, ie: doctor pay, requires an actual market place to come up with real numbers. As it stands, a doctor should be paid as much as the political might of opposing groups will allow.

There is a point to be made about brain drain that Canada suffered from greatly in the 90's. You can't shaft the talented and productive people. Not only was the governments (federal and provincial) mismanaging money, spending like no tomorrow and taxing anyone that had talent to make decent money - they caused an exit. The brightest and most productive people went south where they could earn more, pay less taxes and most importantly not treated as some sacrificial lamb to be looted at will. This is something that should be avoided at all costs.

We Need a Medical Marketplace

The grip of single payer healthcare needs to be broken. A private system needs to, at the very least, be allowed to exist in parallel with the public system. Doctors should be able to pursue market opportunities without the government dictating the terms. Instead of a union and government coming up with an equitable category based style of pay, a doctor can be rewarded for their talent and skill.

This is the only way to at least figure out what is proper for pay. This may result in doctors being paid more, or less, but at least we'll know what doctors should be paid instead of treating them as sacrificial lambs to just serve the public at whatever cost is deemed appropriate.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Energy Market with Unreliables

 The energy market is going to be something that will be on people's minds for a long time because right now there is very poor policy and ideological views driving us to a crisis. There has been a nice little bull run going on over the last few months, and this may not be the crisis. It's something that may immerge here, but it might be 5-10 years from now. For the longest time I've been a passive index investor , and I still am for a nice chunk of my portfolio, but over the last 18 months I've decided that I'm going to apply my own judgment to the market place and invest accordingly. Over this time I've accumulated a pretty sizeable portfolio of LNG (Liquified Natural Gas) companies, in particular upstream and midstream companies. Renewable Energy or Green Energy are Unreliables There is a political push for green energy. It's driven by the moral ideas that green energy is this universally good  energy and all the other reliable energies we use like fossil

Answering COVID19 Conspiratards

  There's a lot to unpack here. "My doctor... vaccinated creates more ammo for the virus to grow stronger and more resistant..." I do admire that his doctor sounds a lot like the anti-vaxx doctors on the internet, but there is much to unpack. Sometimes I don't grasp the past that well, but I'm pretty sure before COVID19 we had vaccines. I think we had a lot of them. Small pox, measles, yearly influenza, etc. The data shows that we aren't being overwhelmed with super measles or seasonal super influenza that is worse and worse each year. It's not to say that it couldn't happen, but with the data we currently possess on vaccines - it isn't happening. Plus, if this were a problem - it isn't a vaccine problem. It would be an immunity problem. Let's just assume we went "all natural" and much of the world was infected with COVID19. Well, most of the world would gain the immune response t-cells and antibodies to fight future infections. A

Efficient Market Hypothesis and Passive Investing

 When it comes to investing in the market, there is a lot of contentious debate about what is best. I have found that people get so wrapped up in defending their strategy that they either overplay the ideas behind the strategy or just outright misrepresent them. I understand wanting one's investment strategy to work best but let us not delude ourselves. "Best" is not something that is easy qualitatively to measure when various investors have different risk tolerances, timelines and goals. The above is no less true when it comes to the Efficient Market Hypothesis (from now on as EMH); both from those for and against the idea of it. I think both (for and against) conceptualize EMH improperly and it takes away from the value it has as an investing strategy. I will add that I have 90% of my investment portfolio invested in passive index funds, which are the products utilized by those that follow EMH and the studies following from it. That's not to say I'm biased towar