Skip to main content

Thoughts on the Canadian Taxpayers Federation

 The Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF) is a group I have followed for a number of years and recently have grown tired of their useless rhetoric, talking points and their complete inability to weigh trade-offs when it comes to taxes. Maybe the organization has changed over the years. Maybe it was always like this and I never noticed until certain issues have come up.

Carbon Tax

The issue that sort of gets me the most is their position on the carbon tax. They're no carbon tax, but in a contextless way. I've gone into this in detail on my thoughts on climate change. I've thought of a pretty good analogy on this part to describe how I view them.

Suppose an organization is against the war in Afghanistan. No matter what, they just shout 'no war'. They'll use any rhetoric they can to say that 'no war for oil', 'no war for Halliburton' or whatever. The issue I have is that this organization cryptically holding back a specific ideological intention. Let's say this organization is an ideological pacifist. So they believe in no violence, not even for self-defense. One thing is an organization saying 'I'm against all war and all violence" rather than "I'm against THIS war." This organization that cloaks such an intention end up morally cornering themselves in odd ways. What I mean by that is say we're in a political climate that most people and parties support the war in Afghanistan and we're going to war. This organization will not only be against it, but they'll also be against funding for resources and equipment for our troops. Even though our troops are already on the battlefield, they're still getting undermined.

If I were against the war, I'd make that clear - but if the troops are off in the battlefield I want them to have the best resources possible.

This is where I see the CTF at this time. It always screams 'no carbon tax', but that isn't enough. If the CTF is against fighting climate change, cool. That's a position where everyone can understand. But they play the position of being against the tax only. They quasi hold fighting climate change, provide no positive solution. What we find in a country with a political climate where all major parties want to fight climate change and meet the Paris targets, that we're not getting to the best solution.

And what I see is they're fighting the carbon tax in away that will see a much larger and more costly regulatory regime put in place.

Millennial/Trolling Style of Conversation

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Energy Market with Unreliables

 The energy market is going to be something that will be on people's minds for a long time because right now there is very poor policy and ideological views driving us to a crisis. There has been a nice little bull run going on over the last few months, and this may not be the crisis. It's something that may immerge here, but it might be 5-10 years from now. For the longest time I've been a passive index investor , and I still am for a nice chunk of my portfolio, but over the last 18 months I've decided that I'm going to apply my own judgment to the market place and invest accordingly. Over this time I've accumulated a pretty sizeable portfolio of LNG (Liquified Natural Gas) companies, in particular upstream and midstream companies. Renewable Energy or Green Energy are Unreliables There is a political push for green energy. It's driven by the moral ideas that green energy is this universally good  energy and all the other reliable energies we use like fossil

Answering COVID19 Conspiratards

  There's a lot to unpack here. "My doctor... vaccinated creates more ammo for the virus to grow stronger and more resistant..." I do admire that his doctor sounds a lot like the anti-vaxx doctors on the internet, but there is much to unpack. Sometimes I don't grasp the past that well, but I'm pretty sure before COVID19 we had vaccines. I think we had a lot of them. Small pox, measles, yearly influenza, etc. The data shows that we aren't being overwhelmed with super measles or seasonal super influenza that is worse and worse each year. It's not to say that it couldn't happen, but with the data we currently possess on vaccines - it isn't happening. Plus, if this were a problem - it isn't a vaccine problem. It would be an immunity problem. Let's just assume we went "all natural" and much of the world was infected with COVID19. Well, most of the world would gain the immune response t-cells and antibodies to fight future infections. A

Efficient Market Hypothesis and Passive Investing

 When it comes to investing in the market, there is a lot of contentious debate about what is best. I have found that people get so wrapped up in defending their strategy that they either overplay the ideas behind the strategy or just outright misrepresent them. I understand wanting one's investment strategy to work best but let us not delude ourselves. "Best" is not something that is easy qualitatively to measure when various investors have different risk tolerances, timelines and goals. The above is no less true when it comes to the Efficient Market Hypothesis (from now on as EMH); both from those for and against the idea of it. I think both (for and against) conceptualize EMH improperly and it takes away from the value it has as an investing strategy. I will add that I have 90% of my investment portfolio invested in passive index funds, which are the products utilized by those that follow EMH and the studies following from it. That's not to say I'm biased towar